I like the idea of the selfcontained cable tester functionality ,
It only requires the addition of a loopback input and a led level meter ,that saves the need for a multimeter to verify signal integrity,
Maybe its worth considdering trying the pocket oscillator idea in SMD , shrinking everything down in scale might push the boundaries in terms of THD .
A Battery-Powered Low Distortion "Pocket" Audio Oscillator With Auto Off
Re: A Battery-Powered Low Distortion "Pocket" Oscillator With Auto Off
It is a good idea. However, from experience, the cost of having a similar enclosure takes up most of the budget of the entire product unless you are buying them in massive amounts from China. It would be very hard to offer a similar/better product at a competitive price whilst still getting a significant profit from it.Tubetec wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 4:50 am I like the idea of the selfcontained cable tester functionality ,
It only requires the addition of a loopback input and a led level meter ,that saves the need for a multimeter to verify signal integrity,
Maybe its worth considdering trying the pocket oscillator idea in SMD , shrinking everything down in scale might push the boundaries in terms of THD .
Bonum certamen certavi, cursum consumavi, fidem servavi.
- mediatechnology
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
- Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
- Contact:
Re: A Battery-Powered Low Distortion "Pocket" Oscillator With Auto Off
I really don't want to re-invent the cable tester wheel.AnalogJoe wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 11:51 amIt is a good idea. However, from experience, the cost of having a similar enclosure takes up most of the budget of the entire product unless you are buying them in massive amounts from China. It would be very hard to offer a similar/better product at a competitive price whilst still getting a significant profit from it.Tubetec wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 4:50 am I like the idea of the selfcontained cable tester functionality ,
It only requires the addition of a loopback input and a led level meter ,that saves the need for a multimeter to verify signal integrity,
Maybe its worth considdering trying the pocket oscillator idea in SMD , shrinking everything down in scale might push the boundaries in terms of THD .
Those bases look well-covered.
For field work I really wouldn't want low THD.
(Fortunately I don't do field work anymore.)
The more I think about it people will probably find a similar use for it as I would: A low cost, low-distortion, floating, balanced oscillator for lab or bench work.
I need to show how to connect a variable unbuffered output level control.
That allows unbalanced outputs up to about +16 dBu.
I have a few boards that I'll put in the store and see how they do.
Re: A Battery-Powered Low Distortion "Pocket" Audio Oscillator With Auto Off
This looks great, just ordered. I have one of Ian's boards as well so having two portable options will be very helpful!
- mediatechnology
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
- Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
- Contact:
Re: A Battery-Powered Low Distortion "Pocket" Audio Oscillator With Auto Off
Thank you! The board will ship to you Monday.