mediatechnology wrote:I'm still marveling over the complete lack of grammar. Ok, it was early...
Waddya expect from Rebel Colonial Yanks!
I'm looking at Gary Herbert's AES preprint to try & figure out what's inside 1600/1646.
The obvious comparison is with Benchmark Media's "0-Ohm" amp.
http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/discuss/f ... dphone-amp
The Sony MDR-V6 example they use is actually one which would probably benefit a lot from current drive. It's supposed to be nominal 60R and their tests show 75Hz 0.6dB peak with Ro=30R. This should translate to a 1.9dB peak with current drive. The 300Hz & 3kHz impedance peaks will be about 0.6dB high with current drive.
I expect measured distortion of the Sony to be less overall and a lot better at 150Hz and 1.1kHz with current drive.
Another factor is the impedance suggests a
lot(??) of electromagnetic damping on the Sony so it is likely, bass shy. Current drive would give more bass.
If a resonance is so bad that it shows an impedance peak of more than 1dB, current drive would be worse, simply cos you are driving the phones harder at those frequencies. Such a resonance would buzz/rattle even on a voltage sine sweep and indeed the impedance curve is the basis of one production test for buzz/rattle.
On the Sennheiser, I'd expect distortion to be less below 1kHz with current drive but it's likely the Sennheiser is lower distortion anyway, even with voltage drive.
Even more interesting would be to repeat his listening tests with current drive.