The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Relax in southern comfort on the east bank of the Mississippi. You're just around the corner from Beale Street and Sun Records. Watch the ducks, throw back a few and tell us what's on your mind.
User avatar
JR.
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by JR. » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:43 am

mediatechnology wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:42 am
Suppressing alternate opinions only feeds the conspiracy inclined who already have trust issues.
Do you believe that world is responding to a "real" and very deadly virus?
It can be deadly, undeniably, how deadly is the question.

Hospitals are seeing increased traffic but this is also the onset of flu season perhaps a double whammy. One example cited by the left is El Paso TX, but that is a stones throw from Juarez Mexico, and their hospitals are slammed, so sick mexicans make the obvious short journey to the US for hospital care.

I am absolutely convinced that media and organizations that gain power from scaring the public (like John's Hopkins) are trying to do exactly that.

I am still keeping my head down and unwilling to risk exposing myself carelessly. I have heard enough anecdotal reports of individuals being infected, one a doctor has the chronic fatigue associated with some covid cases. He is a liberal but I don't think he is making his covid status up.

====
China is having some trouble performing third stage testing trials in some countries (like UAE and Brazil) because not enough trial patients got sick. While I wouldn't expect that problem from Brazil.

Covid is pretty well under control in China and they inoculated over 1 million citizens without full safety testing of the Chinese vaccine, that they are now actively trying to sell around the world (another scheme to gain world power/wealth?).

JR
It's nice to be nice.

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by mediatechnology » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:56 am

What is amazing to me is the fact that anyone would believe that a diagnostic, therapeutic or vaccine could be developed when the virus has NEVER been isolated and purified.
NO ONE has done this.

Therapeutics at least provide some scientific evidence of efficacy but we really don't know for what other than people presenting clinical symptoms associated with the Wu Flu in some cases get better.

And we'd all be fools to believe anything the media tells us when 70% of their news programming and a huge amount of all advertising is big pharma dollars.
That is not the only reason to distrust them but its the most obvious.
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

User avatar
JR.
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by JR. » Sun Nov 29, 2020 7:56 pm

mediatechnology wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:56 am
What is amazing to me is the fact that anyone would believe that a diagnostic, therapeutic or vaccine could be developed when the virus has NEVER been isolated and purified.
NO ONE has done this.
I am not sure what you mean by Isolated and purified?
Therapeutics at least provide some scientific evidence of efficacy but we really don't know for what other than people presenting clinical symptoms associated with the Wu Flu in some cases get better.
again unclear... a couple of the more effective recent vaccines (>90% effective) use messenger RNA not attenuated virus DNA...
And we'd all be fools to believe anything the media tells us when 70% of their news programming and a huge amount of all advertising is big pharma dollars.
That is not the only reason to distrust them but its the most obvious.
I have been hearing about "the sky is falling" conspiracy theories for years, hasn't dropped yet.

I take everything with a shaker of salt, not a grain... A grain of salt makes food easier to swallow, a shaker of salt will gag you. :lol:

JR
It's nice to be nice.

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by mediatechnology » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:19 pm

I am not sure what you mean by Isolated and purified?
Exactly that.
Koch's Postulate #2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates

Never been done with SARS-Covid-2.
No one has cultured the damn thing and apparently no one has even tried to.
again unclear... a couple of the more effective recent vaccines (>90% effective) use messenger RNA not attenuated virus DNA...
Therapeutics and vaccines are two very different things.
Therapeutics = Cure; Vaccine = Prevention
Some therapeutics have been shown to work both empirically and in peer-reviewed studies.
We don't necessarily know that these "cures" cure SARS-Covid-19 since there is no valid test for it but we do know some protocols and therapeutics make clinical symptoms believed to be associated with it disappear.

As to vaccines how could they possibly know that any vaccine is >90% effective if they do not have a pure cultured sample of the virus to challenge-test in vivo?
The effectiveness being quoted is bullshit since they don't have an actual live virus sample to test it on.

The "success" of a vaccine is measured by its creation of antibodies which does not necessarily cause immunity.
Antibodies to what? A tiny section of RNA sequences given to us by the Chinese that are claimed to be associated with SARS-Covid-2?

The vaccines are frauds based on a fraud.
I have been hearing about "the sky is falling" conspiracy theories for years, hasn't dropped yet.
No news organization is going to expose Gates or Big Pharma when they're paying the bills. (I've documented Gates' payments to news orgs.)
Are you that naive?

WRT the "sky falling:"

Tell the people who have lost their businesses, their homes, and are unable to eat - not only because they're suddenly poor- but because grocery stores are closed (New Mexico) due to a largely imaginary virus whose architects ADMIT the virus is being used as a financial reset/power grab tool.

I drive past the long line of cars that never used to form at the North Texas Food Bank.
Their clients' skies have fallen: Over a hoax.

Did you honestly think one year ago JR that people would be forced to wear masks, arrested for going to church or a gym or locked into their homes for weeks on end?
No, you would have said that it was all "conspiracy theory" but hey we're there now.

People need to wake the hell up and see that they are being enslaved.
Fortunately the Europeans have.
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

User avatar
JR.
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by JR. » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:41 am

mediatechnology wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:19 pm
I am not sure what you mean by Isolated and purified?
Exactly that.
Koch's Postulate #2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates

Never been done with SARS-Covid-2.
No one has cultured the damn thing and apparently no one has even tried to.
again unclear... a couple of the more effective recent vaccines (>90% effective) use messenger RNA not attenuated virus DNA...
Therapeutics and vaccines are two very different things.
Therapeutics = Cure; Vaccine = Prevention
Some therapeutics have been shown to work both empirically and in peer-reviewed studies.
We don't necessarily know that these "cures" cure SARS-Covid-19 since there is no valid test for it but we do know some protocols and therapeutics make clinical symptoms believed to be associated with it disappear.

As to vaccines how could they possibly know that any vaccine is >90% effective if they do not have a pure cultured sample of the virus to challenge-test in vivo?
The effectiveness being quoted is bullshit since they don't have an actual live virus sample to test it on.

The "success" of a vaccine is measured by its creation of antibodies which does not necessarily cause immunity.
Antibodies to what? A tiny section of RNA sequences given to us by the Chinese that are claimed to be associated with SARS-Covid-2?

The vaccines are frauds based on a fraud.
They test vaccines in communities where there is active Covid virus community spread.

They inject tens of thousands and give half (?) placebo and the other half (?) The vaccine to be tested.

Then they count how many people caught COVID, and finally check if the ones infected with covid were in the placebo group or the real vaccine group.

This is how they come up with statistical results above 90% effectiveness... The vast majority who caught COVID were from the placebo group.

This is why they reported difficulty testing the vaccine in UAE, not enough people were getting sick to evaluate effectiveness...


JR
I have been hearing about "the sky is falling" conspiracy theories for years, hasn't dropped yet.
No news organization is going to expose Gates or Big Pharma when they're paying the bills. (I've documented Gates' payments to news orgs.)
Are you that naive?

WRT the "sky falling:"

Tell the people who have lost their businesses, their homes, and are unable to eat - not only because they're suddenly poor- but because grocery stores are closed (New Mexico) due to a largely imaginary virus whose architects ADMIT the virus is being used as a financial reset/power grab tool.

I drive past the long line of cars that never used to form at the North Texas Food Bank.
Their clients' skies have fallen: Over a hoax.

Did you honestly think one year ago JR that people would be forced to wear masks, arrested for going to church or a gym or locked into their homes for weeks on end?
No, you would have said that it was all "conspiracy theory" but hey we're there now.

People need to wake the hell up and see that they are being enslaved.
Fortunately the Europeans have.
It's nice to be nice.

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by mediatechnology » Mon Nov 30, 2020 5:40 am

So how do they know who has it?
They use a PCR test.

The PCR test does not work.
Of the positives 90-97% are false.

They cannot legitimately claim someone "has it" or doesn't to prove the effectiveness of a vaccine based on a flawed test.
If one bases proof on flawed data the proof is flawed.
Its is a lie built upon a lie.
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws

Post by mediatechnology » Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:44 am

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws.

https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
ABSTRACT

In the publication entitled “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020) the authors present a diagnostic workflow and RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV (now known as SARS-CoV-2), which they claim to be validated, as well as being a robust diagnostic methodology for use in public-health laboratory settings.

In light of all the consequences resulting from this very publication for societies worldwide, a group of independent researchers performed a point-by-point review of the aforesaid publication in which 1) all components of the presented test design were cross checked, 2) the RT-qPCR protocol-recommendations were assessed w.r.t. good laboratory practice, and 3) parameters examined against relevant scientific literature covering the field.

The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally, the very short timescale between submission and acceptance of the publication (24 hours) signifies that a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality. We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws.

...

SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE PAPER
The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors:

1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.

4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.

In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.
A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/

It's as basic as this: If the test is flawed then conclusions about vaccine effectiveness are flawed because you can't identify "who got it" and "who didn't." It's all a coordinated scam aimed toward complete population control and reduction. They want us dead.
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Wodarg-Yeadon Emergency Petition Regarding mRNA Vaccines

Post by mediatechnology » Sun Dec 06, 2020 2:12 pm

Wodarg-Yeadon Emergency Petition Regarding mRNA Vaccines
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.

The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.

The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr ... -petition/
Wodarg-Yeadon Pleadings: https://proaudiodesignforum.com/images/ ... hibits.pdf
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

WHO (Finally) Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives

Post by mediatechnology » Sat Dec 19, 2020 8:06 pm

WHO (Finally) Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/who-f ... -positives
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: The Corona Virus Hoax of 2020

Post by mediatechnology » Sat Dec 19, 2020 8:19 pm

Mike Yeadon Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer: The Pandemic Is Over

https://www.proaudiodesignforum.com/con ... s_Over.mp4
https://ka-electronics.com

Plandemic Series: "Pland3mic - Indoctornation" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content ... nation.mp4
Plandemic Series: "Plandemic - Doctors In Black" https://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/Plandemic.mp4

CDC: "For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... /index.htm

Post Reply