Search found 5468 matches
- Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:17 pm
- Forum: Pro Audio Design
- Topic: Mid Side M-S Matrix Uses No Precision Resistors
- Replies: 271
- Views: 633929
Re: Mid Side M-S Matrix Uses No Precision Resistors
I had a chance to build the latest version with the added 1240 in the decoder. It works great. https://www.ka-electronics.com/Images/jpg/M-S_Matrix_V127_Proto.JPG This particular board is wired for single ended L&R inputs and outputs. The jumpers can be seen on the left-hand and right-hand side ...
- Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:17 am
- Forum: Build
- Topic: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 75142
Re: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
Randy; The T-Bias scheme does allow the use of smaller values because of the higher CM impedance on the right-hand side of the caps. I wouldn't go much lower than 22 uF though which eliminates the use of film caps due to size. On the single-supply preamp non-polarized capacitors are required because...
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:14 pm
- Forum: Build
- Topic: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 75142
Re: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
The drawing looks good Randy. Can the "pin2 to 3"..200pf cap be either a 220 or 180 ?? Yeah either one. I'm reminded of the movie "Mr. Mom" where Mr. Mom is asked "Are you rewiring for 220?" Mr. Mom answers "Yeah 220, 221." As you point out those 1R5 stop resi...
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:02 pm
- Forum: Build
- Topic: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 75142
Re: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
The OP07 (or OP77) trimmed would be inexpensive. That's the option I've considered for the DC preamp. Either that or an LT1012.
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:38 am
- Forum: Build
- Topic: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 75142
Re: 1510 -- servo, or not ?
Thanks for posting here freqband. I've spent a lot of time lately with the 1510/1512. If you're going to be using this for instrumentation my recommendation would be to just use a Cgain and eliminate the output servo. I do recommend a stepped resistor gain control however for precise repeatability. ...
- Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:07 am
- Forum: Pro Audio Design
- Topic: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
- Replies: 137
- Views: 215919
Re: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
Nice work John. Very simple using two duals. I think keeping the RC network in there is a good thing.
- Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:19 pm
- Forum: Pro Audio Design
- Topic: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
- Replies: 137
- Views: 215919
Re: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
I think we'd need a pan kill of at least 70 dB or more since that's about what a conventional pan pot would produce.
- Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:14 pm
- Forum: Pro Audio Design
- Topic: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
- Replies: 137
- Views: 215919
Re: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
The perhaps flaky data sheet I looked at was something like 8-10 nV/rt hz for those opamps. FWIW something like a 5532 driving the CV would very likely be more than adequate sonically and cheap. The 33078/33079 is more like 4.5 nV/rt Hz: http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/MC33078-D.PDF Not t...
- Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:03 am
- Forum: Pro Audio Design
- Topic: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
- Replies: 137
- Views: 215919
Re: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
John - After thinking about it I went "oops." Yes the DC performance will only be as good as the op amp.
The MC33178/33078/79 are dirt cheap, low Vos and low noise. I'd blow off the passive pad, large C and just drive Ec with the op amp. Less parts to stuff.
The MC33178/33078/79 are dirt cheap, low Vos and low noise. I'd blow off the passive pad, large C and just drive Ec with the op amp. Less parts to stuff.
- Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:53 am
- Forum: Pro Audio Design
- Topic: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
- Replies: 137
- Views: 215919
Re: OTB Mixer Using Current Summation
OK, I follow you there. But wouldn't this also pad down the output offset allowing "looser" (and higher output impedance) quads like a TL074?Using a low noise transistor as an emitter follower I can pad down the opamp noise, and deliver a pretty low output impedance.
Thanks for this....