Op amps: to dual or not to dual? (Part 1 of 2)

A resource for technical documentation. Datasheets, application notes, instruction manuals, books and links to resources are found in the Document Library.
Post Reply
emrr
Posts: 572
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: NC, USA
Contact:

Re: Op amps: to dual or not to dual? (Part 1 of 2)

Post by emrr »

Thanks for pointing this one out.
Best,

Doug Williams
Electromagnetic Radiation Recorders
Gold
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:20 pm

Re: Op amps: to dual or not to dual? (Part 1 of 2)

Post by Gold »

Very interesting. Thanks.
User avatar
JR.
Posts: 3708
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Op amps: to dual or not to dual? (Part 1 of 2)

Post by JR. »

Not to quibble, but I can't agree completely with at least one comment in that article.

They say combing more opamps into a single package increase dissipation. Perhaps this is semantics. Of course 4 opamps in one package will consume and dissipate more power than a single, but multiple opamps can also combine some common functions (like current sources) and actually save power. They probably don't do this a lot because of crosstalk concerns.

It is no accident that dual opamps pin out on opposite sides of the chip, and quads are separated by PS pins. This has be anticipated and well thought out in the designs.

JR

edit- after re-reading they are mainly commenting on the obvious increase in dissipation caused by multiple devices inside one package. never mind /edit
Cancel the "cancel culture", do not support mob hatred.
Post Reply